Image licensing
Westeros is a land of endless conflict. Houses battle for power, armies clash on blood-soaked fields, and entire cities are reduced to rubble. But behind the shifting allegiances and brutal wars lies another challenge — one that no sword or dragon can conquer.
The kingdoms of Westeros depend on their natural resources, yet they use them without restraint. Forests fall to war machines, farmlands are burned in raids, and mines are emptied with no plan for what comes next. If these patterns continued, could Westeros even survive?
Imagine if the rulers of Westeros had a way to measure the long-term effects of their decisions. What if they understood the full impact of deforestation, overfishing, and war? Life Cycle Assessment could have provided that insight — helping them balance survival with sustainability. Some might argue that a world of dragons and White Walkers has no place for environmental foresight, but ignoring it only speeds their downfall.
In this medieval-inspired blog post, let’s explore how Life Cycle Assessment might have changed the fate of Westeros.
Sustainable resource management in the Seven Kingdoms
What is the problem?
Resources in Westeros are used with little concern for long-term availability. The North depletes its forests for construction, the Riverlands overworks its farmland, and the Iron Islands fish their waters with no regard for replenishment. Without intervention, resource depletion threatens entire regions.
How could LCA help?
By assessing the environmental cost of these practices, the kingdoms could have shifted toward sustainable alternatives. The North might have implemented sustainable forestry, reducing deforestation while maintaining timber supply. The Riverlands could have embraced crop rotation to preserve soil health, and the Iron Islands might have adopted fishing limits to prevent stock collapse.
What would change?
Instead of exploiting resources until they were gone, each region could have adjusted its practices to maintain long-term stability. This shift would have strengthened food security, industry, and regional economies without sacrificing the land’s future.
The waste of war: Could Westeros avoid environmental devastation?
What is the problem?
Warfare in Westeros isn’t just deadly — it leaves a lasting environmental toll. The War of the Five Kings devastated farmland, burned entire cities, and left regions uninhabitable. Battles like the Battle of the Bastards resulted in mass casualties and widespread waste.
How could LCA help?
By analyzing the environmental impact of war, rulers might have reconsidered prolonged conflicts. Understanding the full cost of warfare — from deforestation for siege weapons to lost agricultural output — could have encouraged alternative solutions like strategic alliances or controlled engagements.
What would change?
Had the ruling families understood the lasting damage caused by war, they might have sought diplomatic resolutions instead of destruction. Even when conflict was inevitable, more sustainable military strategies could have reduced its long-term environmental impact.
Sustainable agriculture in the reach: Feeding the kingdoms without depleting the land
What is the problem?
The Reach is Westeros’ agricultural hub, producing food for much of the realm. However, intensive farming practices risk soil depletion, reduced yields, and long-term food insecurity.
How could LCA help?
By measuring the environmental impact of different farming methods, the Reach could have implemented sustainable techniques like agroforestry, crop diversification, and soil conservation. These changes would have improved yields while preserving the land.
What would change?
A shift toward sustainable farming would have secured food supplies without exhausting the land. Other regions might have adopted similar practices, leading to a more resilient agricultural system across Westeros.
Winter is coming: How Could climate change have affected Westeros?
What is the problem?
Westeros faces extreme climate shifts, with long winters and unpredictable summers. These conditions impact agriculture, infrastructure, and survival itself. Yet, the kingdoms make little effort to understand or prepare for these changes.
How could LCA help?
By analyzing human activity’s impact on the climate, the kingdoms could have mitigated some of the worst effects. Deforestation in the North and coal mining in the Vale, for example, might have been reconsidered if their long-term consequences were clear.
What would change?
With better environmental policies, Westeros might have built more resilient cities and economies. Renewable energy sources, improved resource conservation, and sustainable land use could have softened the impact of harsh winters and unpredictable summers.
The Iron Throne: Could sustainable construction have saved the kingdom?
What is the problem?
The Iron Throne is a symbol of power, but its construction reflects waste and destruction. Built from the swords of defeated enemies, it represents centuries of war and lost resources.
How could LCA help?
By considering the environmental impact of their buildings, rulers could have chosen materials and techniques that minimized waste. Stone fortresses built with sustainable quarrying practices or timber structures sourced from responsibly managed forests might have replaced resource-heavy construction methods.
What would change?
Westeros could have developed cities and fortresses that lasted longer with less environmental damage. Instead of wasteful displays of power, rulers might have invested in infrastructure that benefited their people and the land.
Dragons and sustainability: A natural resource or an ecological nightmare?
What is the problem?
Dragons are unmatched in power, but their destruction is indiscriminate. A single dragon can burn an entire city to the ground, leaving behind nothing but ruin.
How could LCA help?
By evaluating the impact of using dragons in warfare or transportation, rulers could have explored ways to use their strength without widespread devastation. Dragons might have been used selectively or even for constructive purposes, such as controlled burns for agriculture.
What would change?
Rather than instruments of destruction, dragons could have been managed as a resource. Controlled use might have preserved both cities and ecosystems while still maintaining their strategic advantage.
Could Westeros have survived with Life Cycle Assessment?
The kingdoms of Westeros faced many of the same sustainability challenges as real-world civilizations. Unchecked resource use, environmental destruction, and climate instability all contributed to their struggles. If Life Cycle Assessment had been applied, rulers might have made choices that preserved both their power and the land they depended on.
Sustainability isn’t just a modern concern — it’s a necessity in any society that hopes to endure. While Westeros may be a fictional world, the lessons from its environmental failures are very real. With better planning and a broader perspective, the Seven Kingdoms might have built a future that didn’t rely on war and conquest but on balance and resilience.
For a journey beyond Westeros and into the cosmos, explore The Life Cycle Assessment’s Guide to the Galaxy and be welcomed to the Galaxy of Sustainability.
